This is the third in a series of questions we put to the candidates running for Los Altos City Council. This week: What is your view on the use of surveillance technology for policing, i.e., Flock cameras, other ALPRs, drones? Any trade-offs with civil liberties or privacy concerns?
Larry Lang, Candidate for District 4
We grant police surveillance powers while guarding civil liberties, especially given the current federal administration’s casual disregard for constitutional guarantees. License plates exist because society does not permit anonymous vehicles. Our concern is officials outside local oversight searching our data. Given Flock’s lackluster reputation, we are actively seeking alternatives.
Anky van Deursen, Candidate for District 2
ALPR technology can be an important investigative tool, but it requires strong safeguards and oversight. The unauthorized activation of Flock’s nationwide lookup feature shows policy alone is insufficient. Continued use must ensure city control of data, limited access and retention, regular audits, legal compliance, transparency and vendor accountability to the public.
Lynette Lee Eng, Candidate for District 2
Public safety is a fundamental responsibility of city government. Los Altos should evaluate how surveillance cameras can prevent and solve crime and support investigations, while protecting privacy and civil liberties. We need a balanced, thoughtful approach that uses technology effectively to keep our community safe without compromising individual rights.
